Euler's identity

src: i.ytimg.com

In mathematics, Euler's identity (also known as Euler's equation) is the equality

${\displaystyle e^{i\pi }+1=0}$

where

e is Euler's number, the base of natural logarithms,

i is the imaginary unit, which satisfies i² = -1, and

? is pi, the ratio of the circumference of a circle to its diameter.

Euler's identity is named after the Swiss mathematician Leonhard Euler. It is considered to be an example of mathematical beauty, perhaps a supreme example as it shows a profound connection between the most fundamental numbers in mathematics.

Video Euler's identity

Explanations

Analytic explanation

Euler's identity is a special case of Euler's formula from complex analysis, which states that for any real number x,

${\displaystyle e^{ix}=\cos x+i\sin x}$

where the inputs of the trigonometric functions sine and cosine are given in radians.

In particular, when x = ?,

${\displaystyle e^{i\pi }=\cos \pi +i\sin \pi .}$

Since

${\displaystyle \cos \pi =-1}$

and

${\displaystyle \sin \pi =0,}$

it follows that

${\displaystyle e^{i\pi }=-1+0i,}$

which yields Euler's identity:

${\displaystyle e^{i\pi }+1=0.}$

Geometric explanation

Consider any complex number z represented in polar coordinates:

${\displaystyle z=re^{i\varphi }.}$

Multiplying z by e^i? gives another complex number which has the same magnitude as z, rotated around the origin by the angle ?:

${\displaystyle e^{i\theta }\cdot z=re^{i(\varphi +\theta )}.}$

In this expression, set z = 1 (that is, r = 1 and ? = 0); also set ? = ?. This corresponds to the rotation of the number 1 around the origin by ? radians (180°), which gives -1. In symbols, this is:

${\displaystyle e^{i\pi }\cdot 1=-1.}$

Euler's identity immediately follows.

Maps Euler's identity

Mathematical beauty

Euler's identity is often cited as an example of deep mathematical beauty. Three of the basic arithmetic operations occur exactly once each: addition, multiplication, and exponentiation. The identity also links five fundamental mathematical constants:

• The number 0.
• The number 1.
• The number ? (? = 3.141...).
• The number e (e = 2.718...), which occurs widely in mathematical analysis.
• The number i, the imaginary unit of the complex numbers.

Furthermore, the equation is given in the form of an expression set equal to zero, which is common practice in several areas of mathematics.

Stanford University mathematics professor Keith Devlin has said, "like a Shakespearean sonnet that captures the very essence of love, or a painting that brings out the beauty of the human form that is far more than just skin deep, Euler's equation reaches down into the very depths of existence". And Paul Nahin, a professor emeritus at the University of New Hampshire, who has written a book dedicated to Euler's formula and its applications in Fourier analysis, describes Euler's identity as being "of exquisite beauty".

The mathematics writer Constance Reid has opined that Euler's identity is "the most famous formula in all mathematics". And Benjamin Peirce, a noted American 19th-century philosopher, mathematician, and professor at Harvard University, after proving Euler's identity during a lecture, stated that the identity "is absolutely paradoxical; we cannot understand it, and we don't know what it means, but we have proved it, and therefore we know it must be the truth".

A poll of readers conducted by The Mathematical Intelligencer in 1990 named Euler's identity as the "most beautiful theorem in mathematics". In another poll of readers that was conducted by Physics World in 2004, Euler's identity tied with Maxwell's equations (of electromagnetism) as the "greatest equation ever".

A study of the brains of sixteen mathematicians found that the "emotional brain" (specifically, the medial orbitofrontal cortex, which lights up for beautiful music, poetry, pictures, etc.) lit up more consistently for Euler's identity than for any other formula.

At least two books in popular mathematics have been published about Euler's identity. One is A Most Elegant Equation: Euler's formula and the beauty of mathematics, by David Stipp (2017). Another is Euler's Pioneering Equation: The most beautiful theorem in mathematics, by Robin Wilson (2018).

src: 1.bp.blogspot.com

Generalizations

Euler's identity is also a special case of the more general identity that the nth roots of unity, for n > 1, add up to 0:

${\displaystyle \sum _{k=0}^{n-1}e^{2\pi i{\frac {k}{n}}}=0.}$

Euler's identity is the case where n = 2.

In another field of mathematics, by using quaternion exponentiation, one can show that a similar identity also applies to quaternions. Let {i, j, k} be the basis elements, then,

${\displaystyle e^{{\frac {1}{\sqrt {3}}}(i\pm j\pm k)\pi }+1=0.}$

In general, given real a₁, a₂, and a₃ such that a₁² + a₂² + a₃² = 1, then,

${\displaystyle e^{\left(a_{1}i+a_{2}j+a_{3}k\right)\pi }+1=0.}$

For octonions, with real a_n such that a₁² + a₂² + ... + a₇² = 1 and the octonion basis elements {i₁, i₂,... i₇}, then,

${\displaystyle e^{\left(a_{1}i_{1}+a_{2}i_{2}+\dots +a_{7}i_{7}\right)\pi }+1=0.}$

src: i.ytimg.com

History

It has been claimed that Euler's identity appears in his monumental work of mathematical analysis published in 1748, Introductio in analysin infinitorum. However, it is questionable whether this particular concept can be attributed to Euler himself, as he may never have expressed it. Moreover, while Euler did write in the Introductio about what we today call Euler's formula, which relates e with cosine and sine terms in the field of complex numbers, the English mathematician Roger Cotes (who died in 1716, when Euler was only 9 years old) also knew of this formula and Euler may have acquired the knowledge through his Swiss compatriot Johann Bernoulli.

Robin Wilson states the following.

We've seen how it [Euler's identity] can easily be deduced from results of Johann Bernoulli and Roger Cotes, but that neither of them seems to have done so. Even Euler does not seem to have written it down explicitly - and certainly it doesn't appear in any of his publications - though he must surely have realized that it follows immediately from his identity [i.e. Euler's formula], e^ix = cos x + i sin x. Moreover, it seems to be unknown who first stated the result explicitly....

src: www.kierandkelly.com

See also

• De Moivre's formula
• Exponential function
• Gelfond's constant

src: i.ytimg.com

Notes

src: i.ytimg.com

References

src: ichef.bbci.co.uk

Sources

• Conway, John H., and Guy, Richard K. (1996). The Book of Numbers (Springer) ISBN 978-0-387-97993-9
• Crease, Robert P., "The greatest equations ever", Physics World, 10 May 2004 (registration required)
• Dunham, William (1999), Euler: The Master of Us All. Mathematical Association of America ISBN 978-0-88385-328-3
• Euler, Leonhard. Leonhardi Euleri opera omnia. 1, Opera mathematica. Volumen VIII, Leonhardi Euleri introductio in analysin infinitorum. Tomus primus (Leipzig: B. G. Teubneri, 1922)
• Kasner, E., and Newman, J., Mathematics and the Imagination (Simon & Schuster, 1940)
• Maor, Eli, e: The Story of a number (Princeton University Press, 1998) ISBN 0-691-05854-7
• Nahin, Paul J., Dr. Euler's Fabulous Formula: Cures Many Mathematical Ills (Princeton University Press, 2006) ISBN 978-0-691-11822-2
• Paulos, John Allen, Beyond Numeracy: An Uncommon Dictionary of Mathematics (Penguin Books, 1992) ISBN 0-14-014574-5
• Reid, Constance, From Zero to Infinity (Mathematical Association of America, various editions)
• Sandifer, C. Edward. Euler's Greatest Hits (Mathematical Association of America, 2007) ISBN 978-0-88385-563-8
• Stipp, David (2017), A Most Elegant Equation: Euler's formula and the beauty of mathematics, Basic Books 
• Wilson, Robin (2018), Euler's Pioneering Equation: The most beautiful theorem in mathematics, Oxford University Press 
• Zeki, S.; Romaya, J. P.; Benincasa, D. M. T.; Atiyah, M. F. (2014), "The experience of mathematical beauty and its neural correlates", Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00068 

src: i.ytimg.com

External links

• Complete derivation of Euler's identity
• Intuitive understanding of Euler's formula

Source of the article : Wikipedia